Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Party members
06-24-2013, 01:27 AM
Post: #3
RE: Party members
(06-23-2013 12:26 PM)Galaad Wrote:  I don't really agree there. I think turn based games with a single character can be pretty fun... I dont really have a preference as to party vs 1 character myself. It really depends on how the game is made.


I can't even think of any games that have turn-based combat with a single playable character and think there's a good reason for that. (You start out with one playable character in Fallout 1&2 but you can recruit others).

There's a lot more strategy when you have a party than one character. It's not just a matter of which skill / spell you use by how / when you use it: Should I attack or heal my injured party member? Should I cast this AoE spell even though it will injure one of my party members? Do I have my warrior rush into battle or hold back and protect my weaker spellcaster, etc. Without multiple party members, these considerations don't come into play so I think turn-based combat with one character would likely be extremely monotonous.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Party members - daveyd - 06-22-2013, 02:10 AM
RE: Party members - Galaad - 06-23-2013, 12:26 PM
RE: Party members - daveyd - 06-24-2013 01:27 AM
RE: Party members - cromcrom - 06-24-2013, 03:50 PM
RE: Party members - Galaad - 06-25-2013, 12:57 PM
RE: Party members - Bearhug67 - 08-03-2013, 06:12 PM
RE: Party members - Mark Rushow - 10-25-2013, 02:05 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)